Cases 51 - 60 of 99
Phillips v. Palmer et al
as 5:2013cv04066
Plaintiff:
Donald E Phillips
Defendant:
Charles Palmer, Jason Smith, Brad Wittrock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson et al v. Branstad et al
as 4:2013cv00253
Plaintiff:
Michael Anderson, Gerald Elton Busch, William Cubbage and others
Defendant:
Terry E Branstad, Kim Reynolds, John Baldwin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taft et al v. Palmer et al DO NOT DOCKET IN THIS CASE - ALL PLEADINGS MUST BE DOCKETED IN THE LEAD CASE C12-4086-DEO
as 5:2013cv04047
Plaintiff:
Dave L Taft, Jr , Paul Huston , Michael Millsap and others
Defendant:
Charles Palmer and Jason Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. State of Iowa
as 4:2013cv00212
Plaintiff:
Bruce E Martin
Defendant:
State of Iowa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blakeman v. Lund
as 1:2013cv00033
Plaintiff:
William E Blakeman, III
Defendant:
Mark Lund
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cross v. Stanley
as 4:2013cv00152
Plaintiff:
Floyd E Cross
Defendant:
Judy Stanley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edwards v. Sparks et al
as 4:2013cv00093
Plaintiff:
William Simpson Edwards
Defendant:
Stephen E Sparks, John Boilingcamp, Nancy Roth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blakeman v. Lund
as 2:2013cv01001
Respondent:
Mark Lund
Petitioner:
William E Blakeman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cross v. Fayram
as 4:2013cv00007
Petitioner:
Floyd E Cross
Respondent:
John Fayram
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Blakeman v. Lund
as 4:2012cv00617
Respondent:
Mark Lund
Petitioner:
William E Blakeman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
