Cases 51 - 60 of 2,236
Huerta v. United States of America
as 4:2023cv00677
Petitioner:
Eduardo E. Huerta
Respondent:
United States of America and Freddy Garrido
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Gaffney v. Collier et al
as 6:2023cv00319
Plaintiff:
Paul Sean Gaffney
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, April Zamora, Eric Pichardo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bernard v. Wells et al
as 4:2023cv02359
Plaintiff:
John Davis Bernard, Jr.
Defendant:
Clinton E. Wells, Jr., Robert Sobal, Julio Joglar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Amezquita v. Holmes et al
as 2:2023cv00162
Plaintiff:
Richard Luis Amezquita
Defendant:
E Holmes, Crystal Breauz, Isaac Kwarteng and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2023cv00592
Petitioner:
Marvin E. Taylor
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Keaton v. Milks, et al.
as 4:2023cv00575
Plaintiff:
Adrian Aldon Keaton
Defendant:
Keith A. Milks, Tim Haney, Robert E. L. Richardson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Collier et al
as 4:2023cv02200
Plaintiff:
Charlie Ray Taylor
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Michael Britt, Ariel M. Burks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Odem v. UTMB
as 6:2023cv00441
Plaintiff:
Amy E. Odem
Defendant:
UTMB
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wimberly v. Lumpkin
as 6:2023cv00455
Petitioner:
Christopher E. Wimberly
Respondent:
Larry Lumpkin and Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barclay v. Montgomery County Jail et al
as 4:2023cv02087
Plaintiff:
James E Barclay, III
Defendant:
Montgomery County Jail, Martin, Harper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
