Cases 51 - 60 of 585
Trevino v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 1:2022cv00094
Petitioner:
Ramiro Trevino
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ghanbari Trevino v. Viramontes et al
as 1:2022cv00101
Plaintiff:
Ali Louis Vaysi Ghanbari Trevino
Defendant:
FNU Viramontes, John Doe #1 1:22-cv-101, John Lopez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Macarena Trevino v. Frederick Entzel
as 22-2072
Petitioner / Appellant:
MACARENA TREVINO
Respondent / Appellee:
FREDERICK ENTZEL
Trevino v. Peel et al
as 4:2022cv02330
Plaintiff:
Raul Adame Trevino
Defendant:
Mike Peel, Former Warden Smith, Grant Dickey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Leon v. Larimer County Sheriffs Ofice et al
as 1:2022cv01279
Petitioner:
Raymundo Leon, Jr.
Respondent:
Larimer County Sheriffs Ofice, Boulder County Sheriffs Office, Boulder County District Attorneys Office and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bell v. Trevino et al
as 7:2022cv00204
Plaintiff:
Marcus Bell
Defendant:
Sgt Trevino, L. Webb and J. Gauna
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stoneham v. DeLeon et al
as 5:2022cv00549
Plaintiff:
Frank Stoneham
Defendant:
Michael DeLeon, Velia Meza, District Attorney's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Worthey v. Miniard et al
as 2:2022cv11164
Plaintiff:
Raydontae Worthey
Defendant:
Miniard, Morgan, Ferns and others
Trevino v. Price
as 1:2022cv00568
Plaintiff:
Andrew Trevino
Defendant:
Timothy Price
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arnoldo v. Chapa
as 5:2022cv00054
Petitioner:
Curiel Trevino Luis Arnoldo and Luis Arnoldo Curiel Trevino
Respondent:
Rachel Chapa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
