Cases 51 - 60 of 60
Bell v. USA
as 2:2010cv00094
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Ernesto V. Bell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Bell v. Lauderdale Co. Jail et al
as 4:2010cv00003
Plaintiff:
Thomas Everett Bell
Defendant:
Lauderdale Co. Jail and Billy Sollie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bell v. United States of America et al
as 5:2009cv00214
Plaintiff:
Pierre Bell
Defendant:
United States of America and Warden of FCC Yazoo City
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Walker v. Bell et al
as 5:2009cv00139
Plaintiff:
Tarvio Walker
Defendant:
Unknown Bell and Unknown Allen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bell v. State of Mississippi
as 3:2009cv00366
Plaintiff:
Darral Bell
Defendant:
State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bell v. Kelly et al
as 4:2008cv00131
Petitioner:
Bobby Lee Bell
Respondent:
Lawrence Kelly and Jim Hood
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Maxwell v. Lowndes County Adult Detention Center et al
as 1:2008cv00202
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Maxwell
Defendant:
Lowndes County Adult Detention Center, Patrick Bell, Jessie Brooks and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Bell v. State of Mississippi
as 3:2007cv00609
Plaintiff:
Darral Bell
Defendant:
State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Grimes v. Lowndes County Sheriff Dept. et al
as 1:2007cv00192
Plaintiff:
Adam D. Grimes
Defendant:
Lowndes County Sheriff Dept., Dr. Stanback, Jessie Brooks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gates, et al v. Cook, et al
as 4:1971cv00006
Plaintiff:
Nazareth (nmi) Gates , Willie Lee Holms , Hal Zachary and others
Defendant:
Thomas D. Cook , J. D. Demoville , Turner Arant and others
Movant:
Melvin Griffin, Otis Fairley, Willie X. Stevenson and others
Respondent:
Willie E. March
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
