Cases 51 - 60 of 159
Borrego v. Campbell et al
as 4:2017cv02841
Plaintiff:
Roger Borrego
Defendant:
Joan Campbell and Connie Spence
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv02358
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Campbell v. Thomas
as 2:2017cv00140
Plaintiff:
Paul Don Campbell
Defendant:
Brian Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ferestad v. T.C.C.C. Officer Staff/Medical Staff et al
as 1:2017cv00719
Defendant:
J. Calvert, Sgt. Campbell, Captain FNU Gottner and others
Plaintiff:
Travis A. Ferestad
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Houston Police Department Sex Offender Registration Office et al
as 4:2017cv02138
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Edward Thompson
Defendant:
Houston Police Department Sex Offender Registration Office, TDCJ Parole Division Special Program Division, Raymond Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Uballe v. Ector County Law Enforcement Center Staff, et al
as 7:2017cv00144
Defendant:
Jailer Angie Abalos, Lt. J. Abalos, LVN Beverly Alexander and others
Plaintiff:
Robert David Uballe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Agnew v. ABE Factor & Campbell et al
as 4:2017cv00527
Plaintiff:
Norman L Agnew
Defendant:
ABE Factor & Campbell, Mansfield Police Department, Barry Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Campbell v Davis
as 3:2017cv00154
Petitioner:
John Davis Campbell
Respondent:
Lorie Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Campbell v. Stephen
as 4:2017cv00013
Petitioner:
Joel L. Campbell
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Respondent:
William Stephen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Campbell v. Barber et al
as 1:2017cv00005
Plaintiff:
Albert Anthony Campbell
Defendant:
Mark Allen Barber, Joyce Morris, Michelle Lastrapes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
