Cases 51 - 60 of 63
Fox v. Lower Sioux Tribal Court et al
as 0:2014cv03125
Plaintiff:
Deago Evan Fox
Defendant:
Lower Sioux Tribal Court and Andrew Small
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mehralian v. McManus et al
as 0:2013cv03550
Plaintiff:
Ali Mehralian
Defendant:
Timothy J. McManus, 1st Judicial District Court, Carolyn M. Renn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stafford v. Minnesota Court of Appeals et al
as 0:2011cv03597
Plaintiff:
Bennie Stafford
Defendant:
Minnesota Court of Appeals, Matthew E Johnson, Clerks of the Court of Appeals and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Ramey v. State Court et al
as 0:2011cv02311
Plaintiff:
Scott Wade Ramey
Defendant:
State Court and Albert Lea Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2011cv02045
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Hyden v. Federal Court
as 0:2011cv01597
Plaintiff:
Chris Hyden
Defendant:
Federal Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Midkiff v. Holder et al
as 0:2010cv04620
Plaintiff:
Neulan Midkiff
Defendant:
Eric Holder, Jr., U.S. Department of Justice, B. Todd Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Borrero v. United States of America et al
as 0:2010cv01216
Plaintiff:
Lazaro Despaigne Borrero
Defendant:
United States of America and United States District Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Opsahl v. Minnesota, State of et al
as 0:2009cv03709
Petitioner:
Denis J. Opsahl
Respondent:
Minnesota, State of, Hennepin County Fourth District Courts, Hennepin County Attorneys Office and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Opsahl v. State of Minnesota et al
as 0:2009cv01181
Petitioner:
Denis J. Opsahl
Respondent:
State of Minnesota, Hennepin 4 District Court and Hennepin Co. Detention Ctr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Type:
Prisoner Petitions
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
