Cases 51 - 60 of 245
Stevens v. Johnson
as 3:2019cv00452
Plaintiff:
Greg Stevens
Defendant:
Unnamed Defendant, Will Barham, Office of 5th J D C District Attorney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
June v. Shreveport et al
as 5:2018cv01590
Plaintiff:
Demarcus June
Defendant:
Mrs Montayora, Police Dept of Shreveport, Meskia Creel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Myles v. Stewart et al
as 5:2018cv01470
Defendant:
Mallory A Richard, Mike Spence, James E Stewart, Sr and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory Wayne Myles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Early v. District Attorney
as 3:2018cv00863
Plaintiff:
Christopher Charles Early
Defendant:
District Attorney and West Baton Rouge District Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brumfield v. Tanner
as 2:2018cv08775
Respondent:
Orleans District Attorneys Office and Attorney General State of Louisiana
Plaintiff:
Sherrod Brumfield
Defendant:
Robert Tanner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Navas v. JPCC/Correct Health et al
as 2:2018cv06846
Defendant:
Julio Alvarado, Sky Noble, District Attorney and others
Plaintiff:
Pedro Alberto Monterroso Navas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Payton v. Shreveport et al
as 5:2018cv00795
Plaintiff:
Kevin Payton
Defendant:
City of Shreveport, Police Dept of Shreveport, T D Weldon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis, Jr. v. District Attorney 19th JDC
as 3:2018cv00622
Plaintiff:
Adam Davis, Jr.
Defendant:
District Attorney 19th JDC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Early v. District Attorney
as 5:2018cv00627
Plaintiff:
Christopher Charles Early
Defendant:
District Attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodenkirch v. Ascension Parish District Attorney's Office et al
as 3:2018cv00488
Respondent:
Ascension Parish District Attorney's Office and Ricky Babin
Petitioner:
Thomas Michael Rodenkirch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
