Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Virginia
Cases 51 - 60 of 62
Day v. Mathena
as 7:2011cv00042
Petitioner: Clyde Owen Day, Jr
Respondent: R.C. Mathena
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Farrakhan v. Johnson et al
as 1:2010cv00924
Plaintiff: Shaka Amir Farrakhan
Defendant: Gene Johnson, J. Jabe, Stevens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barbour v. Stanford et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2010cv00243
Plaintiff: Kenneth Edward Barbour
Defendant: Ms. Furgirill, In Correctional Facilities Great walls and Fences 2403(B) may apply, In Dead Corpus Day Violations 2403 (A) may apply and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Day v. USA
as 1:2009cv00769
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: George Cornelius Day
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Bowler v. Ray et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2009cv00238
Plaintiff: Joseph Bowler
Defendant: Tracy S. Ray, Staff, L. Fleming and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Butler v. Higgs, et al.
as 1:2009cv00103
Plaintiff: Terrance Butler
Defendant: Joseph Higgs, Shallenburger, Day and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Arthur v. Day et al
as 1:2009cv00037
Plaintiff: Bernard J. Arthur
Defendant: E. Day, A. Johnson and W. D. Jennings
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Moore v. Miller et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2008cv00614
Defendant: J. Miller, A. Taylor, Brown and others
Plaintiff: Terry J. Moore
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Day v. USA
as 5:2008cv80107
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: David Allen Day
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Dixon v. Danville City Jail (Medical) et al
as 7:2008cv00346
Plaintiff: Louis E Dixon, III
Defendant: Danville City Jail (Medical), Nurse Turner, Day and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?