Cases 51 - 59 of 59
Dawkins v. Caskey et al
as 4:2009cv00047
Plaintiff:
Ellis Dawkins
Defendant:
Dale Caskey and Bart Grimes
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Ellis v. State of Mississippi et al
as 1:2009cv00179
Plaintiff:
Fredrick C. Ellis
Defendant:
State of Mississippi and Jerry O. Terry
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Ellis v. McIntyre et al
as 4:2008cv00095
Plaintiff:
Robert Earl Ellis
Defendant:
Kathryn McIntyre, Christopher Epps, Lawrence Kelley and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Perry v. Crockett et al
as 4:2008cv00025
Plaintiff:
Timothy Edward Perry
Defendant:
Johnny Crockett, Margie Donald, Ellis Smoot and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ellis v. Misskelley et al
as 3:2008cv00044
Plaintiff:
Robert Earl Ellis
Defendant:
Cooper Misskelley and State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ellis v. Byrd et al
as 4:2007cv00163
Petitioner:
Yvon Ellis
Respondent:
Raymond Byrd and Jim Hood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ellis v. Columbus Police Dept. et al
as 1:2007cv00124
Plaintiff:
Robert Ellis, Jr.
Defendant:
Columbus Police Dept., Ryan Woods, Wade Beard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Virgil v. Copiah County Sheriff's Department et al
as 3:2007cv00181
Plaintiff:
Robert Virgil
Defendant:
Copiah County Sheriff's Department, City of Hazlehurst Police Dept., Southwest Mississippi Narcotics Unit and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gates, et al v. Cook, et al
as 4:1971cv00006
Plaintiff:
Nazareth (nmi) Gates , Willie Lee Holms , Hal Zachary and others
Defendant:
Thomas D. Cook , J. D. Demoville , Turner Arant and others
Movant:
Melvin Griffin, Otis Fairley, Willie X. Stevenson and others
Respondent:
Willie E. March
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
