Cases 51 - 60 of 183
David Banks v. Burl Cain, Warden, et al
as 14-30829
Petitioner - Appellant:
DAVID LAMAR BANKS
Respondent - Appellee:
BURL CAIN, WARDEN, LOUISIANA STATE PENITENTIARY and JAMES CALDWELL, Attorney General for the State of Louisiana
Johnson v. Scott et al
as 5:2014cv02262
Defendant:
Charles R Scott, Suzanne M Owens, James Caldwell and others
Plaintiff:
Jerrod D Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Cain et al
as 3:2014cv00398
Respondent:
Burl Cain and James Caldwell
Petitioner:
Derrick N. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hatcher v. Cain et al
as 3:2014cv00390
Respondent:
N. Burl Cain and James Caldwell
Petitioner:
Anthony M Hatcher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Withers v. Cain et al
as 3:2014cv00376
Respondent:
N. Burl Cain and James Caldwell
Petitioner:
Michael W. Withers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Landry v. Cain et al
as 3:2014cv00372
Respondent:
Burl Cain and James Caldwell
Petitioner:
Jeremy Landry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. Vannoy et al
as 3:2014cv00352
Petitioner:
Leon Brown
Respondent:
James Caldwell and Darrel Vannoy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wiley v. Caldwell et al
as 3:2014cv00337
Respondent:
James Caldwell and East Louisiana Mental Health System
Petitioner:
Christopher George Wiley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Anderson v. Cain et al
as 3:2014cv00341
Petitioner:
Chad Anderson
Respondent:
N. Burl Cain and James Caldwell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Crum v. Cain et al
as 3:2014cv00319
Respondent:
N. Burl Cain and James Caldwell
Petitioner:
Earl Crum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
