Cases 51 - 60 of 1,253
Foster v. Jones et al
as 4:2023cv00260
Plaintiff:
Trevor Foster
Defendant:
Joshua Jones, Ms. Alisa Hammock and Mr. McGhee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Steven James Gomez Jr. v. D. Richardson
as 1:2023cv04892
Plaintiff:
Steven James Gomez Jr.
Defendant:
Officer D. Richardson, Judge Jennifer Neal-Jones, Christopher Kehell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Butler et al v. Oliver et al
as 4:2023cv00311
Plaintiff:
Darryl Pernell Butler
Defendant:
Tyrone Oliver, Timothy Ward, Ahmed Holt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Richmond County Sheriff Department et al
as 1:2023cv00160
Plaintiff:
Christopher F. Jones
Defendant:
Richmond County Sheriff Department and Wellpath
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crawford v. Jones
as 1:2023cv04946
Petitioner:
Abdul Crawford
Respondent:
Joshua Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kitchens v. Jones et al
as 4:2023cv00242
Plaintiff:
Shawn Kitchens
Defendant:
Warden Josha Jones and Dr. Carowe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crawford v. Jones
as 4:2023cv00241
Petitioner:
Abdul Crawford
Respondent:
Joshua Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hitchcock v. Jones
as 4:2023cv00239
Plaintiff:
Aaron Hitchcock
Defendant:
Joshua Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sheets v Jones
as 4:2023cv00234
Plaintiff:
Ricky Sheets
Defendant:
Joshua Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Chatham County Detention Center et al
as 4:2023cv00296
Plaintiff:
Hakeem Wilson
Defendant:
Chatham County Detention Center, Chatham County Sheriff's Office, Whitney Gregory and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
