Cases 51 - 60 of 70
Jones v. Harcye et al
as 0:2011cv00616
Plaintiff:
K.R. Jones
Defendant:
T. Harcye , (C.?) Wallace , T. Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hayes v. U.S. Department of Justice et al
as 0:2011cv00462
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Hayes
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Federal Medical Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Redding et al
as 0:2011cv00386
Plaintiff:
Baron Montero Jones
Defendant:
Stephen L. Redding, Rachelle Drakeford, Gregory Mulligan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Midkiff v. Holder et al
as 0:2010cv04620
Plaintiff:
Neulan Midkiff
Defendant:
Eric Holder, Jr., U.S. Department of Justice, B. Todd Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beale v. Jones et al
as 0:2010cv04293
Petitioner:
Robert Bonine Beale
Respondent:
B. Todd Jones and Bruce Pearson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jones v. Jett
as 0:2010cv04201
Plaintiff:
Kelly Jones
Defendant:
Warden Jett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jones v. USADO NOT DOCKET. ALL DOCKETING OCCURS IN THE CRIMINAL CASE.
as 0:2010cv02679
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Wendell Raymone Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Jones v. Cruz et al
as 0:2009cv01568
Petitioner:
Todd Curtis Jones
Respondent:
M. Cruz, M. Cruz, T. Amundson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Type:
Prisoner Petitions
Jones v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 0:2009cv01074
Petitioner:
Kelly Jones
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Federal Bureau of Prisons, United States of America and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jones v. Ramsey, County of et al
as 0:2009cv00689
Plaintiff:
Annette Jones and Annette Jones
Defendant:
Ramsey, County of, Robert Fletcher, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
