Cases 51 - 60 of 69
Kelly v. Judge Advocate General of the Navy et al
as 5:2012cv03067
Plaintiff:
Detric A. Kelly
Defendant:
Judge Advocate General of the Navy, Robert E. Treuting, Pat Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Kelly (ID 06771) v. McKune et al
as 5:2011cv03233
Petitioner:
Thomas Odell Kelly
Respondent:
David R. McKune and Attorney General of Kansas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ward v. Hollingsworth
as 5:2011cv03212
Petitioner:
Kelly Corbin Ward
Respondent:
Lisa J.W. Hollingsworth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Lynn v. Roberts et al
as 5:2011cv03073
Plaintiff:
Patrick C. Lynn
Defendant:
Ray Roberts, Larry Hoshaw, Susan Gibreal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ciota v. Chester
as 5:2010cv03020
Petitioner:
Frank Kelly Ciota
Respondent:
C. Chester
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Moncla v. Kelly et al
as 5:2009cv03137
Plaintiff:
David Moncla
Defendant:
Robert Kelly, Russell Stenseng and Robert Sapien
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Kansas State Board of Indigent Defense Services et al
as 5:2009cv03091
Plaintiff:
Anthony L. Davis
Defendant:
Kansas State Board of Indigent Defense Services, Carol J. Bacon, John and Jane Does and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Van Houten v. Roberts et al
as 5:2008cv03012
Plaintiff:
James E Van Houten
Defendant:
Raymond Roberts, (fnu) Heimegardner, (fnu) Dragoo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kelly v. Feleciano et al
as 5:2007cv03274
Plaintiff:
Altus Ray Kelly
Defendant:
Paul Feleciano, Roger Werholtz, Cherryl Hensley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murray v. Kelly et al
as 5:2007cv03248
Plaintiff:
Ronald Murray
Defendant:
R Kelly and Raymond Roberts, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
