Cases 51 - 60 of 67
May v. Kansas, State of et al
as 5:2009cv03281
Petitioner:
Tommy May
Respondent:
Kansas, State of and Kansas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hurt v. McKune, et al
as 09-3330
Petitioner - Appellant:
NATHENIAL T. HURT
Respondent - Appellee:
DAVID MCKUNE, Warden, Lansing Correctional Facility and STEPHEN N. SIX, Kansas Attorney General
Mays v. State of Kansas, et al
as 09-3177
Petitioner - Appellant:
DANIEL LEE MAYS
Respondent - Appellee:
J. SHELTON, STATE OF KANSAS, J. SHELTON and others
Ross v. Aramark Correctional Services, Inc. et al
as 5:2009cv03117
Plaintiff:
Lisa Renee Ross
Defendant:
Aramark Correctional Services, Inc., (fnu) Melugin, (fnu) Suter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meeks v. McKune, et al
as 09-3133
Petitioner - Appellant:
REGINALD MEEKS
Respondent - Appellee:
DAVID MCKUNE, Warden and STEPHEN N. SIX, Kansas Attorney General
Mays v. State of Kansas et al
as 5:2009cv03059
Petitioner:
Daniel Lee Mays
Respondent:
State of Kansas, J. Shelton, Kansas Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Steward v. Ruddick et al
as 5:2009cv03021
Petitioner:
Gary W. Steward
Respondent:
Peter Ruddick and Kansas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Swanner v. McKune, et al
as 08-3352
Petitioner - Appellant:
CLAYTON SWANNER
Respondent - Appellee:
MICHAEL NELSON, Warden, Lansing Correctional Facility, DAVID R. MCKUNE, Warden, Warden, Lansing Correctional Facility and STEPHEN N. SIX, Kansas Attorney General
Buffington v. Six
as 08-3328
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROBERT LEE BUFFINGTON
Respondent - Appellee:
STEPHEN N. SIX, Kansas Attorney General
Lopez v. McKune, et al
as 08-3284
Petitioner - Appellant:
ADRIAN LOPEZ
Respondent - Appellee:
DAVID R. MCKUNE, Warden, Warden, Lansing Correctional Facility and PAUL MORRISON, Kansas Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
