Cases 51 - 60 of 92
Murphy v. Calumet Lubricate
as 5:2015cv02317
Plaintiff:
Stephen W Murphy
Defendant:
Calumet Lubricate
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phillips v. Alexandria et al
as 1:2015cv02052
Plaintiff:
Dontrale Demarko Phillips
Defendant:
City of Alexandria, Police Dept of Alexandria, Jaques Roy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hutchins v. Corrections et al
as 5:2015cv01833
Plaintiff:
Barry Hutchins
Defendant:
NY Dept of Corrections, Police Dept City of New York, Rikers Island Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Amos v. Winn Correctional Center
as 6:2015cv00545
Plaintiff:
Murphy Amos
Defendant:
Warden Winn Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Adams v. Tangipahoa Parish Sheriff's Office et al
as 2:2014cv02649
Plaintiff:
Alden Adams
Defendant:
Tangipahoa Parish Sheriff's Office, Stuart Murphy, Schirra Finn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pea v. Edwards et al
as 2:2014cv01764
Plaintiff:
Stephen Pea
Defendant:
Daniel Edwards, Stuart Murphy, Brandon Pinion and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Evans v. Edwards et al
as 2:2014cv00041
Plaintiff:
Steven B. Evans
Defendant:
Daniel H Edwards, Joyce Jackson, Stuart Murphy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gardner v. Louisiana State Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2013cv05866
Plaintiff:
Theoplious Gardner
Defendant:
Louisiana State Department of Corrections, James LeBlanc, Robert C Tanner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Granger v. Tangipahoa Parish Jail Administration et al
as 2:2012cv02754
Plaintiff:
Rodger Will Granger, Sr
Defendant:
Tangipahoa Parish Jail Administration, Stewart Murphy and Sherry Tompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. LeBlanc et al
as 2:2012cv01689
Plaintiff:
Baron Johnson
Defendant:
James M. LeBlanc, Louisiana Department of Public Safety & Corrections, Louisiana State and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
