Cases 51 - 60 of 60
GLAZEWSKI v. HERSHKOWITZ et al
as 2:2009cv04292
Plaintiff:
VINCENT W. GLAZEWSKI
Defendant:
JON HERSHKOWITZ, IUBKOLA OGUNNOWO, AVYNNE HESTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SANCHEZ v. VICTORIA SECRET STORES L.L.C. et al
as 2:2009cv04141
Plaintiff:
JUAN SANCHEZ
Defendant:
VICTORIA SECRET STORES L.L.C., MANAGER-SUSIE, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ELCHEIKHALI v. RADIO SHACK STORE AND ITS MANAGER
as 2:2009cv01461
Plaintiff:
ABBAS ELCHEIKHALI
Defendant:
RADIO SHACK STORE AND ITS MANAGER
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
DOYON v. WARDEN et al
as 1:2009cv00736
Plaintiff:
LAURIER DOYON
Defendant:
WARDEN, ASSOCIATE WARDENS, UNIT MANAGERS and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
BURHYTE v. WARDEN et al
as 1:2009cv00739
Plaintiff:
SCOTT BURHYTE
Defendant:
WARDEN, ASSOCIATE WARDENS, UNIT MANAGERS and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
JACKSON v. WARDEN et al
as 1:2009cv00740
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL JACKSON
Defendant:
WARDEN, ASSOCIATE WARDENS, UNIT MANAGERS and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
BENNETT v. WARDEN et al
as 1:2009cv00737
Plaintiff:
OMAR BENNETT
Defendant:
WARDEN, ASSOCIATE WARDENS, UNIT MANAGERS and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
LATTANZIO v. WARDEN et al
as 1:2009cv00738
Plaintiff:
VINCENT LATTANZIO
Defendant:
WARDEN, ASSOCIATE WARDENS, UNIT MANAGERS and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
TINSLEY v. STATE OF NJ DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2008cv06273
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL TINSLEY
Defendant:
STATE OF NJ DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, CLASSIFICATION DEPT. OFFICERS, SOUTH WOODS STATE PRISON and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
HAGWOOD et al v. WARDEN et al
as 1:2008cv06010
Plaintiff:
BURTON HAGWOOD, DOYON LAURIER, OMAR BENNETT and others
Defendant:
WARDEN, ASSOCIATE WARDENS, UNIT MANAGERS and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
