Cases 51 - 60 of 161
Baams v. Coakley et al
as 1:2013cv13115
Plaintiff:
Ronny Baams, Jr.
Defendant:
Martha Coakley, Peter A. Pepe, Bruce Gelb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DeNino v. Jones et al
as 1:2013cv13101
Plaintiff:
David J. DeNino
Defendant:
Liam R. Jones, Peter Konstankos, Alfred T. Ingham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ward v. Bellotti et al
as 1:2013cv12054
Plaintiff:
James T. Ward
Defendant:
Michael G. Bellotti , P.J. Coletta , Fred Canniff and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Valentin v. Pepe et al
as 1:2013cv11782
Plaintiff:
Miguel R. Valentin
Defendant:
Peter A. Pepe, Jr., Matthew J. Burnieika, Christopher M. Pacheco and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. UMass Correctional Health Care et al
as 4:2013cv40048
Plaintiff:
Mark V. Hill
Defendant:
UMass Correctional Health Care, Maria L. Angeles, Linda Booth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Snyder v. South Middlesex Correctional Center et al
as 1:2013cv11013
Plaintiff:
Joanna M. Snyder
Defendant:
South Middlesex Correctional Center, Lisa Jackson, Michael Souza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rasheed v. Newry et al
as 1:2012cv12210
Plaintiff:
Rashad Akeem Rasheed
Defendant:
Carmen Newry, Bartholomew Nelson, Dan Lachance and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Diaz v. Spencer et al
as 1:2012cv12154
Plaintiff:
Juan Diaz
Defendant:
Luis S. Spencer, Peter A Pepper. Jr, Harold W. Clarke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rasheed v. Newry et al
as 1:2012cv12094
Plaintiff:
Rashad Rasheed
Defendant:
Carmen Newry, Bartholomew Nelson, Patricia Grant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Glawson v. Clarke et al
as 1:2012cv11162
Plaintiff:
Richard D. Glawson
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, James Bender, Ronald Duval and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
