Cases 51 - 60 of 70
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv00009
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Pierce v. Callaghan et al
as 7:2009cv00145
Petitioner:
Donald A. Pierce
Respondent:
Joseph Callaghan and Emily Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pierce v. Callahan et al
as 7:2009cv00126
Plaintiff:
Donald A. Pierce
Defendant:
Joseph Callahan, Emily Brown and Williams Phillips
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. Adamson et al
as 4:2009cv00076
Plaintiff:
Adrian Lewis
Defendant:
W. W. Adamson, Jim Wetherington, M. Linda Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Collins et al v. Adamson et al
as 4:2009cv00068
Plaintiff:
Bruce Bernard Collins
Defendant:
W. W. Adamson, Douglas Pullen, Jim Wetherington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woody et al v. Couch et al
as 2:2009cv00010
Plaintiff:
Thomas Franklin Woody, Monica Thomas Holder, Imani Robertson and others
Defendant:
Gerald Couch, Matt Gaudio, Steve Cronic and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clay v. Hunter et al
as 4:2009cv00002
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Clay
Defendant:
Robert Wadkins, Rachelle Hunter, S Ziegler and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Pierce v. Hall County Jail et al
as 2:2008cv00249
Plaintiff:
Douglas Leonard Pierce
Defendant:
Hall County Jail and Medical Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kelsey v. Pierce et al
as 4:2008cv00160
Plaintiff:
Kameron Bernard Kelsey
Defendant:
Linda Pierce and Bobby Peters
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Kelsey v. Pierce et al
as 1:2008cv03719
Plaintiff:
Kameron Kelsey
Defendant:
Linda Pierce and Bobby C. Peters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
