Cases 51 - 60 of 67
Cantrell v. Administrative Subdivision et al
as 3:2007cv05568
Plaintiff:
David Gordon Cantrell
Defendant:
Administrative Subdivision, State of Washington, Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. United States of America
as 3:2007cv05456
Petitioner:
Robinson Walter Smith
Respondent:
United States of America and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Robinson v. Engel
as 2:2007cv00273
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Robinson
Defendant:
Donald Engel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Dr. Thysell, et al
as 2:2007cv03071
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Robinson
Defendant:
Fred Thysell and Shannon Morrison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. The Dental Department for YCDOC Jail
as 2:2007cv03061
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Robinson
Defendant:
The Dental Department for YCDOC Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Washington State Bar Association
as 2:2007cv03057
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Robinson
Defendant:
Washington State Bar Association
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Yakima Indian Nation Personnel
as 2:2007cv03058
Defendant:
Cynthia Robinson and Yakima Indian Nation Personnel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Hoffman
as 2:2007cv03055
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Robinson
Defendant:
Rick Hoffman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Anderson
as 2:2007cv03046
Plaintiff:
Cynthia A Robinson
Defendant:
Phyllis Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Yakima County District Court
as 2:2007cv03036
Petitioner:
Cynthia A Robinson
Respondent:
Yakima County District Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
