Cases 51 - 60 of 1,401
Al-haj v. Chres et al
as 6:2023cv06184
Plaintiff:
Nagibe Al-haj
Defendant:
SHTA Chres, SHTA Janis, SHTA Duanna and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams, Jr. v. City of New York et al
as 1:2023cv02700
Plaintiff:
Alexander Williams, Jr.
Defendant:
City of New York, Joanne Matos, Antoinette Cort and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02439
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lewis et al v. City Of New York et al
as 1:2023cv02600
Lead Plaintiff:
Raymond Lewis and Frederick Ortiz
Defendant:
CITY OF NEW YORK, Department of Correction (NYC), John Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moss v. City of New York et al
as 1:2023cv01632
Plaintiff:
Andrew Moss
Defendant:
The City of New York, Correction Officer Melvine Lewis, CO Ebaka and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01561
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Hilton v. Caringi et al
as 9:2023cv00209
Plaintiff:
James D. Hilton
Defendant:
Caringi, Mahan, McDonald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. City of New York et al
as 1:2023cv01189
Plaintiff:
Diamond Smith
Defendant:
City of New York, Correction Officer John Doe, Correction Captain John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Duren v. County of Monroe et al
as 6:2023cv06066
Plaintiff:
Gerard L. Duren
Defendant:
County of Monroe, Sgt. Drosa, Deputy Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grefer v. Smith
as 6:2023cv06003
Plaintiff:
Charles R. Grefer
Defendant:
Jerrod W. Smith, Esq.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
