Cases 51 - 60 of 61
Ollervides-Sanchez v. United States of America
as 1:2012cv00040
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Oscar David Ollervides-Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Goins v. ICARD et al
as 7:2011cv00112
Defendant:
ICARD, Shirley Lewis and Chris Prine
Plaintiff:
KEATON SANCHEZ GOINS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanchez Jaquez v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2011cv02622
Plaintiff:
Manuel Ramon Sanchez Jaquez
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, USP - Atlanta's Medical Staff, Unit Team Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanchez v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2011cv00010
Petitioner:
Alejandro Cano Sanchez
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Sanchez v. United States of America
as 1:2010cv02938
Petitioner:
Rigoberto Sanchez
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Sanchez v. Hogan et al
as 5:2010cv00039
Plaintiff:
Eustaquio P Sanchez
Defendant:
J J Hogan, Mike Boyd, Gary Lancaster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morales et al
as 3:2009cv00040
Petitioner:
Jose Ernesto Perez Morales, Ramon Santana, Eggy Rocha and others
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Corrections Corp. of America, McRae Correctional Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00581
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Habeas Corpus:INS
Diaz-Sanchez v. United States DHS/ICE et al
as 4:2008cv00037
Petitioner:
Miguel Antonio Diaz-Sanchez
Respondent:
United States DHS/ICE and CCA Stewart Detention Center
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Alvarez-Sanchez v. USA
as 1:2007cv02826
Petitioner:
Ramon Alvarez-Sanchez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
