Cases 51 - 60 of 70
Shaw v. Henry County Drug Court Program et al
as 1:2013cv03542
Plaintiff:
Micha Raynell Shaw
Defendant:
Henry County Drug Court Program, Brian J. Amero, James L. Wright, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simmons v. Shaw et al
as 2:2013cv00094
Plaintiff:
Richard Simmons
Defendant:
Kendall L. Shaw, FNU Lindsey, Mr. (FNU) Beverly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shaw v. Henry County Drug Court Program et al
as 1:2012cv03742
Plaintiff:
Micha Raynell Shaw
Defendant:
Henry County Drug Court Program, Flint Circuit Public Defenders Office, McDonough Probation and others
Shaw v. Stewart et al
as 2:2012cv00157
Plaintiff:
Carlton Reed Shaw, Jr.
Defendant:
Debra Stewart, Tucker and Thurman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SHAW v. HALL et al
as 5:2012cv00135
Plaintiff:
DEXTER SHAW
Defendant:
HILTON HALL, CARL HUMPHREY, GARY CALDWELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nerlich v. Pritchard et al
as 2:2012cv00006
Plaintiff:
William I. Nerlich
Defendant:
David Pritchard, Scott Schleder, Anthony Haynes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Redditt v. Fayette County Georgia et al
as 5:2011cv00170
Plaintiff:
Louise Redditt
Defendant:
Fayette County Georgia, Wayne Hannah, Charles Cowart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shaw v. Ajibade et al
as 3:2011cv00027
Plaintiff:
John L. Shaw
Defendant:
FNU Ajibade, FNU Powell and FNU Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shaw v. Hall et al
as 5:2010cv00083
Plaintiff:
Dexter Shaw
Defendant:
Hilton Hall, Steve Upton, Glen Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shaw v. Wells et al
as 3:2009cv00103
Petitioner:
Wayne Anthony Shaw
Respondent:
Walt Wells, Attorney General and Erick Holder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
