Cases 51 - 60 of 142
Krajeski v. Beamer et al
as 3:2016cv00252
Defendant:
Dr. Beamer, Dr. Dewsnap, John and Jane Does 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Krajeski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Charlton v. Gulick et al
as 2:2016cv00126
Plaintiff:
Bobby Shane Charlton
Defendant:
Dr. Garth Gulick, Dr. Steven Shelton and Robert White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tilahun v. Gower et al
as 6:2016cv00070
Defendant:
Gower, Michael F. Gower, Jana Russell and others
Plaintiff:
Tilahun and Shua Tilahun
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woodroffe v. State of Oregon et al
as 2:2015cv02390
Defendant:
Victor Beerbower, Lt. Boston, Jill Curtis and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Woodroffe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gurule v. Taylor et al
as 2:2015cv02260
Defendant:
L. Beamer, J. Dafoe, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Richard E. Gurule
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alexander v. Peters et al
as 2:2015cv02179
Plaintiff:
Robert Dale Alexander
Defendant:
Lt. Boston, Amy Eynon, Michael Gower and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Freeman et al v. Angelozzi et al
as 3:2015cv02163
Defendant:
Anderson, R. Angelozzi, Dr. Thomas Bristol and others
Plaintiff:
Does 1-5 and Anthony Bernard Freeman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Farrar v. Peters et al
as 6:2015cv01935
Defendant:
Captain Bellman, G. Gulick, A. Hughes and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen L. Farrar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Romero v. Cofey et al
as 6:2015cv01905
Defendant:
Carrie Cofey, Dr. Paulson Reed and Steve Shelton, M.D.
Plaintiff:
Danny Romero
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. Myrick et al
as 2:2015cv01449
Defendant:
Jane/John Doe, John Myrick and Steve Shelton, M.D.
Plaintiff:
Sean P. Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
