Cases 51 - 60 of 2,652
Duvall v. Gregg County Sheriff
as 6:2024cv00115
Petitioner:
Steven Lee Duvall
Respondent:
Gregg County Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Newson v. Douglas et al
as 3:2024cv00098
Plaintiff:
Devoris Newson
Defendant:
Richard D. Douglas, Robert W. Wedemeyer, Camille R. McMullen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Solomon v. Sheriff, Jefferson County
as 1:2024cv00109
Petitioner:
Surafel H. Solomon
Respondent:
Sheriff, Jefferson County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Baker v. Cerliano et al
as 6:2024cv00106
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Baker
Defendant:
Sheriff Maxey Cerliano, Cpl. Devon Fuller, Cpl. Ryan Rimlinger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Sheriff of Ellis County
as 3:2024cv00677
Plaintiff:
Richard Johnson
Defendant:
Sheriff of Ellis County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. Sheriff of Ellis County
as 3:2024cv00680
Plaintiff:
Wilver Rodriguez
Defendant:
Sheriff of Ellis County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Contreras v. Sheriff of Ellis County
as 3:2024cv00678
Plaintiff:
Lazaro Contreras
Defendant:
Sheriff of Ellis County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coler v. Sheriff of Ellis County
as 3:2024cv00679
Plaintiff:
Christopher Coler
Defendant:
Sheriff of Ellis County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hancock v. Sheriff Skinner et al
as 4:2024cv00252
Plaintiff:
Anthony E Hancock
Defendant:
John Doe, Jane Doe, FNU Arrant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hammons v. Fannin County Sheriff and Police Officers, et al.
as 4:2024cv00236
Plaintiff:
Houston Samuel Hammons
Defendant:
Fannin County Sheriff and Police Officers, Fannin Co TX and State of TX
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
