Cases 51 - 60 of 126
Matthew Washington v. State Board of Pardons and Par
as 16-10722
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MATTHEW WASHINGTON
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES
Edward Ridley v. State of Georgia, et al
as 15-15689
Petitioner - Appellant:
EDWARD TYRONE RIDLEY
Respondent - Appellee:
STATE OF GEORGIA, STATE BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES, HEATHER STRICKLAND and others
Berry et al v. State of Georgia et al
as 1:2015cv04255
Plaintiff:
Freeman Berry
Defendant:
State of Georgia, Deborah C. Benefield, Bonnie Kay Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ridley v. State of Georgia et al
as 1:2015cv04155
Petitioner:
Edward Tyrone Ridley
Respondent:
State of Georgia, State Board of Pardons and Paroles, Heather Strickland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Browner v. Fountain et al
as 6:2015cv00126
Plaintiff:
Antonio Browner
Defendant:
Lisa Fountain, Homer Bryson, Doug Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KIRKLAND v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 5:2015cv00340
Plaintiff:
SCOTT KIRKLAND
Defendant:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JACKSON STATE PRISON, RUTLEDGE STATE PRISON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Browner v. Fountain et al
as 6:2015cv00091
Plaintiff:
Antonio Browner
Defendant:
Lisa Fountain, Homes Bryson, Doug Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015cv00291
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
BROWNER v. FOUNTAIN et al
as 5:2015cv00261
Petitioner:
ANTONIO BROWNER
Respondent:
LISA FOUNTAIN, BIBB COUNTY GEORGIA, HOMER BRYSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Edwards v. Coffee County Facility et al
as 5:2015cv00034
Plaintiff:
Randy Edwards
Defendant:
Coffee County Facility, Corrections Corporation of America, Grady Perry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
