Cases 51 - 60 of 1,112
Adams v. CoreCivic of Tennessee, LLC et al
as 3:2023cv00823
Plaintiff:
Christopher Adams
Defendant:
CoreCivic of Tennessee, LLC, Damon Hininger, Steve Conry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pipkin v. Coffee et al
as 2:2023cv02483
Plaintiff:
Byron Pipkin
Defendant:
Lee V. Coffee, Leslie Byrd, State of Tennessee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Odom, Jr v. State of Tennessee
as 3:2023cv00679
Petitioner:
Melvin A. Odom, Jr
Respondent:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Neal v. State of Tennessee
as 2:2023cv00039
Plaintiff:
Terry Neal
Defendant:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. State of Tennessee
as 3:2023cv00227
Petitioner:
Jeffery Davis
Respondent:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hill-Williams v. State of Tennessee
as 2:2023cv02382
Petitioner:
Joshua Hill-Williams
Respondent:
State of Tennessee and Zac Pounds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Padgett v. State of Tennessee
as 1:2023cv00136
Petitioner:
Albert Padgett
Respondent:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stanley v. State of Tennessee
as 1:2023cv00124
Petitioner:
Julia Stanley
Respondent:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Blackmon v. State of Tennessee
as 1:2023cv01102
Petitioner:
Alexander Blackmon
Respondent:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Grayson Jr v. State of Tennessee, The
as 3:2023cv00549
Petitioner:
Ricky Lane Grayson Jr
Respondent:
State of Tennessee, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
