Cases 51 - 60 of 68
Powers v. Lochard et al
as 3:2014cv03262
Plaintiff:
Thomas Powers
Defendant:
Hugh Lochard and John/Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Powers v. Scott et al
as 3:2014cv03201
Plaintiff:
Thomas Powers
Defendant:
Gregg Scott, Eric Kunkel, Steve Dredge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Powers v. Scott et al
as 3:2014cv03148
Plaintiff:
Thomas Powers
Defendant:
Gregg Scott, Danielle Walker and Paul Mann
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Powers v. Depuy Orthopaedics Inc
as 3:2014cv03061
Plaintiff:
Thomas Powers
Defendant:
Depuy Orthopaedics Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas Powers v. Salvador Godinez, et al
as 13-2579
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS POWERS
Defendant - Appellee:
SALVADOR A. GODINEZ, Director of the Illinois Department of Corrections, GLADYS TAYLOR, Director of the Illinois Department of Corrections, MICHAEL P. RANDLE, Director of the Illinois Department of Corrections and others
Powers v. Lochard et al
as 3:2013cv03134
Plaintiff:
Thomas Powers
Defendant:
Hugh Lochard, Michael Bednarz, Wexford Health Services Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Powers v. Hankins et al
as 3:2013cv03097
Plaintiff:
Thomas Powers
Defendant:
Joseph Hankins, James Christopher Clayton, Shan Jumper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas Edward King v. State of California et al
as 2:2013cv02315
Defendant:
Archie Biggers, Archie Biggers, Board of Parole Hearings and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Edward King, Jr
Powers v. Jumper et al
as 3:2013cv03057
Plaintiff:
Thomas Powers
Defendant:
Shan Jumper, Forrest Ashby, James Clayton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Powers v. Godinez et al
as 3:2012cv03304
Plaintiff:
Thomas Powers
Defendant:
S A Godinez, Gladys Taylor, Michael Randle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
