Cases 51 - 60 of 184
Staples v. United States of America et al
as 5:2018cv03094
Plaintiff:
William Staples
Defendant:
United States of America, Mark S. Inch, Ian Conners and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ealom v. United States of America et al
as 5:2018cv03045
Plaintiff:
Valeriece D. Ealom
Defendant:
United States of America, Core Civic Corporation, (fnu) Malanowski and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wilson v. United States of America et al
as 5:2017cv03224
Plaintiff:
Jayme Wilson
Defendant:
United States of America, Core Civic Corporation, (fnu) Wiggins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mount v. United States of America et al
as 5:2017cv03223
Plaintiff:
Nicole Mount
Defendant:
United States of America, Core Civic Corporation, Gregory Buhler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Brown v. United States of America
as 5:2017cv03216
Petitioner:
Sean Patrick Brown
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Clervrain v. United States of America et al
as 5:2017cv03194
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain
Defendant:
United States of America and Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Gauthier v. United States of America et al
as 5:2017cv03171
Plaintiff:
Jason Gauthier
Defendant:
United States of America, Bureau of Prisons, (fnu) Carrizales and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Russian v. United States of America
as 5:2017cv03163
Petitioner:
James D. Russian
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Warren v. United States of America
as 5:2017cv03096
Petitioner:
Johnny Scott Warren
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Maier v. United States of America et al
as 5:2017cv03085
Plaintiff:
Christopher Coty Maier
Defendant:
United States of America, Kansas, State of, Douglas County District Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
