Cases 51 - 60 of 69
Derrick Allen v. State of Florida, et al
as 10-13191
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DERRICK ALLEN
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF FLORIDA, U.S. DISTRICT COURT and U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
Allen v. State of Florida et al
as 1:2010cv21591
Plaintiff:
Derrick Allen
Defendant:
State of Florida, U.S. District Court and U.S. Court of Appeal Eleventh Circuit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sampson v U.S. Court of Appeals
as 2:2010cv00405
Petitioner:
Tony Andre Sampson
Respondent:
U.S. Court of Appeals
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tony Andre Sampson v U.S. Court of Appeals
as 2:2010cv00823
Petitioner:
Tony Andre Sampson
Respondent:
U.S. Court of Appeals
Luevano v. Reid et al
as 3:2009cv00420
Plaintiff:
Jaime Luevano
Defendant:
Harry Reid, Mitch McConnell, Greg Abbott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas Sukup v. Victoria Minor, et al
as 09-15381
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS MARTIN SUKUP
Defendant - Appellee:
VICTORIA C. MINOR, JACK L. WAGNER, N.D. DUONG and others
Rolle v. Sherrill et al
as 3:2009cv00106
Plaintiff:
Randall Lamont Rolle
Defendant:
William C. Sherrill, Jr., Allan Kornblum, Maurice M. Paul and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Timothy DeShazer v. Federal Judge(s) of the U.S. C, et al
as 09-1090
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIMOTHY J. DESHAZER
Defendant - Appellee:
FEDERAL JUDGES OF THE U.S. COURT OF APPEALS and FEDERAL JUDGES OF THE 10TH CIRCUIT
Sukup v. Minor et al
as 2:2008cv02877
Plaintiff:
Thomas Martin Sukup
Defendant:
Victoria C. Minor, Jack L Wagner, N D Duong and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
DeShazer v. Federal Judge(s) U.S. Court of Appeals et al
as 1:2008cv01277
Plaintiff:
Timothy DeShazer
Defendant:
Federal Judge(s) U.S. Court of Appeals and Federal Judge(s) on the 10th Circuit
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
