Cases 51 - 60 of 60
Fowler v. Knipp
as 2:2011cv00911
Petitioner:
Brian Fowler
Respondent:
W. Knipp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Walker v. Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
as 1:2010cv01782
Plaintiff:
Antonio L. Walker
Defendant:
Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, S. Smith, K. Doherty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allen v. Fallon et al
as 2:2010cv01320
Plaintiff:
William M. Allen
Defendant:
W. Fallon, W. Knipp, H.M. Lackner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sims v. Wohlers et al
as 2:2009cv02582
Plaintiff:
Darius Sims
Defendant:
Anne Wohlers, Silvia Garcia, M. Bunnell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sims v. Wohlers et al
as 3:2009cv04080
Plaintiff:
Darius Sims
Defendant:
Anne Wohlers, Silvia Garcia, M. Bunnell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Warner v. Cate et al
as 2:2009cv01568
Plaintiff:
Earl Warner
Defendant:
Mathew L. Cate, M. Martel, W. Knipp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Galvan v. Purviance et al
as 2:2008cv00883
Plaintiff:
Chad Anthony Galvan
Defendant:
S. Purviance, C. R. Sharps, W. W. Knipp and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Adams v. Subia et al
as 2:2007cv01225
Plaintiff:
Alvan A. Adams
Defendant:
R Subia, W Knipp, J C Blim and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Granger v. Campbell, et. al.
as 2:2007cv00602
Plaintiff:
Andrew L. Granger
Defendant:
Roseanne Campbell, California Dept. of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Office of Community Resources and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harless v. Campbell, et. al.
as 2:2007cv00600
Plaintiff:
Ben V. Harless
Defendant:
Roseanne Campbell, California Dept. of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Office of Community Resources and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.