Cases 51 - 60 of 80
Fitzpatrick et al v. Bivins et al
as 3:2012cv00048
Petitioner:
Walter Fitzpatrick, III and M J Blanchard
Respondent:
Bill Bivins and The State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ward et al v. Corrections Corporation America et al
as 1:2012cv00012
Plaintiff:
Robert Ward, Justin Bazzano and Walter Bowman
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation America, Cherry Lindamood, Dodd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. S.C.D.C. et al
as 2:2011cv03084
Plaintiff:
Dana Walker
Defendant:
S.C.D.C., James E. Coleman, Dennis Tillman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garrett v. Rutherford County et al
as 3:2011cv00734
Plaintiff:
Bobby Walter Garrett
Defendant:
Rutherford County and Rutherford County Adult Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ward et al v. CCA et al
as 1:2011cv01203
Plaintiff:
Robert Ward, Justin Bozzona and Walter Bowman
Defendant:
CCA and Cherry Lindamood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ward et al v. Corrections Corporation America et al
as 1:2011cv01207
Plaintiff:
Robert Ward, Justin Bazzano and Walter Bowman
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation America, Cherry Lindamood, Dodd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cayce v. George et al
as 1:2011cv00046
Plaintiff:
Trevor Houston Cayce
Defendant:
Enoch R. George , Debra Wagonschutz , Robin Walters and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. United States of America
as 2:2011cv02372
Petitioner:
Walter Thomas Williams, III
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Moore v. Ford et al
as 2:2011cv02307
Plaintiff:
Alonzo Tyrone Moore
Defendant:
Joe Ford, Andrew Tabor, Walter Crews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Umoja et al v. Andrews et al
as 2:2011cv02121
Plaintiff:
Yaquin Abdallah Amadu Umoja, Walter Shegog, Jr. and Julius T. Andrews
Defendant:
Farwell, Benn, Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
