Cases 51 - 60 of 4,986
Fernandez v. Davis
as 4:2024cv03187
Plaintiff:
William Fernandez
Defendant:
Correctional Officer D. Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Keith Anthony Williams v. James Engleman
as 2:2024cv04441
Defendant:
James Engleman
Petitioner:
Keith Anthony Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Williams v. Newsom et al
as 3:2024cv00902
Plaintiff:
John W. Williams
Defendant:
Michael Newman, Gavin Newsom, James Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Furtado v. Calipatria State Prison
as 3:2024cv02967
Defendant:
Calipatria State Prison
Plaintiff:
Andre William Furtado
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Borla
as 3:2024cv02878
Respondent:
Edward Borla
Petitioner:
Cameron Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv02895
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Abdullah v. Santoro, et al.
as 1:2024cv00572
Defendant:
M. Ayala, Lovett, K. Mixon and others
Plaintiff:
Jalaal Abdullah
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Montgomery v. People of the State of California et al
as 2:2024cv01348
Plaintiff:
Jonlynn S. Montgomery
Defendant:
People of the State of California, Superior Court of California, Sacramento County, William R. Ridgeway, Justice Center Probate and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Bonilla v. Shubb
as 2:2024cv01353
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla, VEXATIOUS LITIGANT
Defendant:
William B. Shubb
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Watson v. Smith
as 1:2024cv00567
Petitioner:
Dale William Watson
Respondent:
Stephen Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
