Cases 51 - 60 of 1,388
PONDER v. BLOODSAW et al
as 5:2023cv00284
Plaintiff:
JEREMIAH D PONDER
Defendant:
GEORGIA BLOODSAW, DEMETRIUS SWINT, DANIELS CYNTHIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clay v. Dillman et al
as 2:2023cv00086
Plaintiff:
Byron Donnelle Clay
Defendant:
Dr. S. Dillman, Nurse D Savage, Nurse T. Garlin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Green v. Pineiro et al
as 4:2023cv00199
Plaintiff:
Tyrone B. Green
Defendant:
Warden Aaron Pineiro, D/W B. Kaigler, Dr. O. Awe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FIGUEROA-RIVERA v. JONES
as 5:2023cv00230
Plaintiff:
ERIC MANUEL FIGUEROA-RIVERA
Defendant:
D JONES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. EMMONS et al
as 7:2023cv00075
Plaintiff:
KENDRICK R MARTIN
Defendant:
Warden S EMMONS, Warden R SHROPSHIRE, C MIMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Drake v. Woodruff et al
as 3:2023cv00121
Plaintiff:
Christopher D. Drake
Defendant:
Sheriff James Woodruff, Brady Pike, Erick Durrough and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cooper v. United States Of America
as 2:2023cv00078
Petitioner:
Zaeveon D. Cooper
Respondent:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Kelley v. Mims
as 1:2023cv02734
Petitioner:
Frederick D. Kelley
Respondent:
Warden Charles Mims
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
FLORENCE v. JACKSON et al
as 4:2023cv00110
Plaintiff:
KIM CAMILLE FLORENCE
Defendant:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY STACEY JACKSON, Mayor SKIP HENDERSON, Sheriff GREG COUNTRYMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robertson v. Kilgore et al
as 3:2023cv00099
Plaintiff:
Reginald Roderick Robertson
Defendant:
Officer Scott Kilgore, J.M. Ebert, J.M. Curtis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
