Cases 51 - 60 of 121
Bates v. Morgan County DHR
as 5:2014cv01143
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Carlos Bates
Defendant:
Morgan County DHR and Michael Wilhelm
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Howell v. Estes et al
as 5:2014cv01106
Plaintiff:
Jessie Lee Howell
Defendant:
Dewayne Estes, Jimmy Patrick, Dothey Goode and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
D.G. v. Thomas et al
as 5:2014cv01056
Plaintiff:
D.G.
Defendant:
Kim Thomas and Alabama Department of Corrections
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney and staff attorney 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dotson v. Markham
as 6:2014cv00772
Plaintiff:
David K. Dotson
Defendant:
Benny C. Markham
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perry v. Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2014cv00748
Plaintiff:
Quantez N Perry
Defendant:
Department of Corrections and Kim Thomas
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gutierrez v. Hassel et al
as 4:2014cv00738
Plaintiff:
Leonardo Gutierrez
Defendant:
Scott Hassel, Scott Pitman, George H Lund, III and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Johnson v. Roper et al
as 2:2014cv00717
Plaintiff:
Demaraaron C. Johnson
Defendant:
A. C. Roper and Janice Hatcher
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Belue v. Benn et al
as 2:2014cv00688
Plaintiff:
Donald Ray Belue
Defendant:
John R Benn, Gary W Alverson and Vicki Gamble
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gates v. Hutton
as 7:2014cv00676
Plaintiff:
Brian Keith Gates
Defendant:
John Hutton
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carter v. Laseter et al
as 2:2014cv00665
Plaintiff:
Mark Hughes Carter
Defendant:
Laseter, Reni Mason and Kim Thomas
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
