Cases 51 - 60 of 120,542
(PC) Jackson v. Pouge, et al.
as 1:2024cv00585
Plaintiff:
Cornel Jackson
Defendant:
Tyson Pouge, Esteves, Cpt. Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bentley v. Inzunza et al
as 3:2024cv00860
Plaintiff:
Douglas Ray Bentley
Defendant:
Marisol Inzunza, A. Enriquez and O. Perez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Chavez v. St. Andre et al
as 2:2024cv01384
Plaintiff:
Michael Ray Chavez
Defendant:
Rob St. Andre, Mitchell Knedler, Darrow Richardson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tyrell Ainsworth v. Correctional Officer David Fores et al
as 2:2024cv04029
Plaintiff:
Tyrell Ainsworth
Defendant:
Correctional Officer David Fores, Correctional Officer Peta, Correctional Officer Neri and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cozine v. Amezquita et al
as 3:2024cv01737
Plaintiff:
Jacob Dylan Cozine
Defendant:
Officer C. Amezquita and Officer J. Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hildebrand v. Campbell
as 5:2024cv01791
Petitioner:
Michael Hildebrand
Respondent:
Trisha Campbell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Borla
as 5:2024cv02878
Petitioner:
Cameron Williams
Respondent:
Edward Borla
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02938
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02944
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lettieri v. Four in One
as 4:2024cv02898
Plaintiff:
David C. Lettieri
Defendant:
Four in One
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
