Cases 51 - 60 of 23,120
Dailey v. Morgan et al
as 2:2024cv01139
Defendant:
Mrs Morgan, Mr. Hamm, Mr Murray and others
Plaintiff:
Earl Dailey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Russell v. Michael et al
as 5:2024cv01134
Defendant:
Head Mental Health Nurse and Evans Michael
Plaintiff:
Lionel Russell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Fleming et al
as 2:2024cv01138
Defendant:
Nicholas Mueller and Joshua Fleming
Plaintiff:
Bruce Lamar Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McQueen v. Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2024cv00292
Defendant:
Department of Corrections and Gang Members
Plaintiff:
Marcus Dewayne McQueen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reed v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv08020
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Keon Ladell Reed
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Shedd v. Streeter et al
as 5:2024cv01127
Respondent:
Warden Streeter and Attorney General of the State of Alabama
Petitioner:
James William Shedd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barber v. Patton
as 1:2024cv01129
Petitioner:
Beverly Owen Barber
Respondent:
Javan Patton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McQueen v. Shelby County Sheriff Department et al
as 2:2024cv01124
Defendant:
Chiquita Marbury and Shelby County Sheriff Department
Plaintiff:
Marcus Dewayne McQueen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Carr
as 2:2024cv01125
Defendant:
Danny Carr
Plaintiff:
Justin DeVonterrious Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Noe v. Summerford et al
as 4:2024cv01126
Defendant:
Colby L Mathews and Summer McWhorter Summerford
Plaintiff:
Terry R Noe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
