Cases 61 - 70 of 584
Casby v. McConnell et al
as 1:2022cv00873
Plaintiff:
Cyrus Casby
Defendant:
Warden McConnell, HIPPA Ceo, M Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Casby v. McConnell et al
as 1:2022cv00837
Plaintiff:
Cyrus Casby and Original Juice Mann
Defendant:
Warden McConnell, Dr King, Dr Humi and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Banks v. Craddock et al
as 2:2022cv00697
Plaintiff:
Albert E Banks, Jr
Defendant:
Joshua Craddock, Dep Hicks and Deputy Hicks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dobbin v. Stewart
as 5:2022cv00590
Petitioner:
Cedrick Dumar Dobbin
Respondent:
James E Stewart, Sr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Johnson v. Johnson et al
as 5:2022cv00581
Plaintiff:
Kareem Abdul Johnson
Defendant:
Janella Denice Johnson, Vincent E Webb, City of Shreveport and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Stewart
as 5:2022cv00425
Plaintiff:
Kareem Abdul Johnson
Defendant:
James E Stewart, Sr and State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Washington v. Edwards et al
as 3:2022cv00084
Plaintiff:
Timothy Washington
Defendant:
John Bel Edwards, James LeBlanc, Jason Kent and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Franklin et al
as 3:2022cv00021
Plaintiff:
Ronald Williams
Defendant:
Cassandra Franklin, James LeBlanc, James E. Stewart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ballou v. Jacobs
as 5:2022cv00078
Plaintiff:
John E Ballow, Jr and John E Ballou, Jr
Defendant:
Captain Jacobs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Simmons v. LeBlanc et al
as 3:2021cv00706
Plaintiff:
Edward Simmons
Defendant:
James LeBlanc, E. Brown, Unknown Verrett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
