Cases 61 - 70 of 1,513
Slivienski v. Corey
as 9:2023cv01127
Petitioner:
Thomas Slivienski
Respondent:
Joseph E. Corey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Richardson v. Wyoming County Jail
as 6:2023cv06491
Plaintiff:
Joseph E. Richardson
Defendant:
Wyoming County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blair v. Lowerre
as 9:2023cv01015
Petitioner:
Nailon Blair
Respondent:
E. Lowerre
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lucas v. Uhler et al
as 9:2023cv00999
Plaintiff:
London Lucas
Defendant:
D. Uhler, J. Messenger, R. Butler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ruggiero v. Jones et al
as 7:2023cv07157
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ruggiero
Defendant:
Stefanie E. Jones, Kevin C. Eschmann, Paul E. Julien and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bailey v. Wolcott et al
as 1:2023cv00822
Plaintiff:
LeRon Bailey
Defendant:
J. Wolcott, J. West, E. Raczkowski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Jones
as 9:2023cv00959
Petitioner:
Christopher E. Robinson
Respondent:
Gerald Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Murphy v. Rodriguez et al
as 7:2023cv06998
Plaintiff:
Adam E. Murphy
Defendant:
ERT Medical Officer K. Rodriguez, ERT Officer Pullen, ERT Officer Prelvukaj and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lettieri v. Department of Justice
as 1:2023cv00788
Plaintiff:
David C. Lettieri
Defendant:
Department of Justice and Maeve E. Huggins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Megginson v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2023cv06798
Plaintiff:
Michael E. Megginson
Defendant:
The City of New York, Louis Molina, Christopher Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
