Cases 61 - 70 of 304
WYCKOFF v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 1:2017cv03537
Plaintiff:
KASHIFE H. WYCKOFF
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, ERIC TAYLOR, FRANK LOBERTO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DRAKE v. SALUTI et al
as 2:2017cv02643
Plaintiff:
KEITH H. DRAKE
Defendant:
GERALD M. SALUTI, NED ROSENBERG, J.S.C, JANICE MASSARO, ESQ. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCFADDEN v. COUNTY OF PASSAIC et al
as 2:2017cv02332
Plaintiff:
KENDELL SHAREEK MCFADDEN
Defendant:
COUNTY OF PASSAIC, PASSAIC COUNTY BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS, RICHARD H. BERDNICK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ASHLEY-DRAKE v. RUSSELL et al
as 2:2017cv02016
Plaintiff:
KEITH H ASHLEY-DRAKE
Defendant:
LESLIE R. RUSSELL and JOSH BURGOS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROBINSON v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2017cv01468
Plaintiff:
LARRY H. ROBINSON
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALBERTO v. NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD et al
as 3:2016cv09397
Petitioner:
RUBEN H. ALBERTO
Respondent:
NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD, JAMES PLOUSIS, BRANDON ROSE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MITCHELL v. BERDWIK, et als
as 2:2016cv09159
Petitioner:
MARCELLUS MITCHELL
Respondent:
RICHARD H. BERDWIK, MICHAEL TOLERICO, RONALD D. WIGLER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
THILO v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2016cv08821
Plaintiff:
CHARLES H. THILO
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CARSTARPHEN v. MCLAUGHLIN et al
as 1:2016cv08290
Plaintiff:
VAUGHN CARSTARPHEN
Defendant:
MICHAEL N. MCLAUGHLIN, WILLIAM FONTANEZ, CHARLES H. BILLINGHAM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOFFMAN v. CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
as 1:2016cv07988
Plaintiff:
ANNA H. HOFFMAN
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
