Cases 61 - 70 of 474
Heath et al v. Adams et al
as 6:2022cv00070
Plaintiff:
Jerrod Antonio Heath, Crishaun Heath, Christen Heath and others
Defendant:
Warden Brian Adams, Joseph Barnes, Quan Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CRUTCHLEY v. PAULK et al
as 7:2022cv00095
Plaintiff:
ADAM WADE CRUTCHLEY
Defendant:
Warden ASHLEY PAULK, Officer JACKSON and Officer NESMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alexander v. Long et al
as 1:2022cv03492
Plaintiff:
Liam Alexander
Defendant:
Ann Long, Gregory Adams, Laura Alford and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Prisoner Civil Rights
Whittle v. Vaughn et al
as 3:2022cv00094
Plaintiff:
Thomas Andrew Whittle
Defendant:
The State of Georgia, Timothy Vaughn, Kelli Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CHANEY v. ADAMS et al
as 5:2022cv00293
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL JEROME CHANEY, JR
Defendant:
JHONATHON L ADAMS and ATTORNEY GENERAL CHRISTOPHER M CARR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David v. Boston et al
as 1:2022cv02988
Plaintiff:
Deonta David
Defendant:
Sherry Boston, Joshua M. Geller, Helen Pott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edwards v. Nursing Staff et al
as 6:2022cv00056
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Z. Edwards
Defendant:
Nursing Staff, Mr. Brian Adams, Jennifer Jerreil and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BURROUGHS et al v. HILL et al
as 5:2022cv00272
Plaintiff:
TORRES ANTWAN BURROUGHS and SHEILA DENISE BURROUGHS
Defendant:
HILL, FOSTER, STATE OF GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daker v. Adams
as 1:2022cv02776
Petitioner:
Waseem Daker
Respondent:
Brian Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tehuti-El v. Bell
as 2:2022cv00064
Petitioner:
Ausar Tehuti-El
Respondent:
Adam Bell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
