Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Texas
Cases 61 - 70 of 858
Joe Adam Ramirez v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2023cv00181
Petitioner: Joe Adam Ramirez
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Smith v. Adams et al
as 5:2023cv00134
Plaintiff: Franklin Smith
Defendant: FNU Adams, Vincent Romero and FNU LNU 5:23-CV-134-C
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hurdsman v. Cozby et al
as 1:2023cv00099
Petitioner: Rodney Adam Hurdsman
Respondent: Jennifer Cozby and Colette Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Adams v. Unknown
as 4:2023cv01529
Plaintiff: Jamie Alan Adams
Defendant: Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Gonzales et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv00068
Plaintiff: Roderick Delaine Brown and Roderick D Brown
Defendant: Adam R Gonzales, Nebiyu A Tesfaw, Lori R Fuller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv01437
Petitioner: Alex Adams
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Adams v. Texas Board of Pardons We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv00103
Plaintiff: Alex Adams
Defendant: Texas Board of Pardons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Adams v. Layton We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2023cv00176
Petitioner: Alex Adams
Respondent: Sergeant FNU Layton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hurdsman v. Peters
as 1:2023cv00084
Petitioner: Rodney Adam Hurdsman
Respondent: Colette Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Hurdsman v. Peters
as 3:2023cv00780
Petitioner: Rodney Adam Hurdsman
Respondent: Colette Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?