Cases 61 - 70 of 886
SCHOICKET v. DILLS
as 3:2022cv00094
Petitioner:
REBECCA D SCHOICKET
Respondent:
WARDEN ALLEN DILLS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Schoicket v. Dills
as 1:2022cv03908
Petitioner:
Rebecca D. Schoicket
Respondent:
Warden Allen Dills
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Winn v. Roundtree et al
as 1:2022cv00127
Plaintiff:
James L. Winn
Defendant:
Sheriff Richard Roundtree, Sheriff Deputy Zachary Cuonzo-Simmons, Sheriff Deputy Brandon Kennedy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daker v. Dozier et al
as 6:2022cv00072
Plaintiff:
Waseem Daker
Defendant:
Gregory Dozier, Homer Bryson, Timothy Ward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miles v. Anthony et al
as 1:2022cv03805
Plaintiff:
Rodney Jerome Miles
Defendant:
C/O Anthony, DW Mims, DW Chambers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAKER v. WARD et al
as 5:2022cv00342
Plaintiff:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD, BRIAN OWENS, HOMER BRYSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAKER v. WARD et al
as 5:2022cv00341
Plaintiff:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD, GREGORY DOZIER, HOMER BRYSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FEDD v. ARRENDALE STATE PRISON
as 1:2022cv00144
Plaintiff:
NEOTHA FEDD
Defendant:
ARRENDALE STATE PRISON
Respondent:
WARDEN ALLEN DILLS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frilando v. Long et al
as 1:2022cv03678
Plaintiff:
John Frilando
Defendant:
Warden Michael Long, Warden Calvin Oliphant, Deputy Warden Dean and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCullough v. Boston et al
as 1:2022cv03201
Plaintiff:
Alaye' S. McCullough
Defendant:
Sherry Boston, Stacey Hydricks, Allison E. Layton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
