Cases 61 - 70 of 201
Oats v. Wills et al
as 3:2023cv03037
Plaintiff:
Roderick S Oats, Jr
Defendant:
Anthony Wills, John Doe 1, C/O Sanders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
French v. Wills et al
as 3:2023cv02948
Plaintiff:
Marcellus A. French, Sr.
Defendant:
Anthony Wills, Major Rowland, Joshua A. Schoenbeck and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Wills
as 3:2023cv02890
Petitioner:
Blake O. Wilson
Respondent:
Anthony Wills
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Croom v. Hughes et al
as 3:2023cv02885
Plaintiff:
Christopher Croom
Defendant:
Latoya Hughes, Rob Jeffreys and Anthony Wills
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phillips v. Wills
as 3:2023cv03256
Petitioner:
Antonio Phillips
Respondent:
Anthony Wills
Not Classified By Court:
Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lipscomb v. Rice et al
as 3:2023cv02800
Plaintiff:
Keon V. Lipscomb
Defendant:
Rice, C/O Hampton, Anthony Wills and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lyons v. Wills et al
as 3:2023cv02801
Plaintiff:
Martin Lyons
Defendant:
Anthony Wills, Kevin Reichert, Sara McClure and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sangster v. Hughes et al
as 3:2023cv02581
Plaintiff:
Antoine Sangster
Defendant:
Latoya Hughes, Anthony Wills and Wexford Healthcare Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lomeli v. Wills et al
as 3:2023cv02518
Plaintiff:
Luis A. Lomeli
Defendant:
Anthony Wills, Schanz, C/O Bohnert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Justin Dalcollo v. Anthony Wills, et al
as 23-2348
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JUSTIN L. DALCOLLO
Defendant / Appellee:
ANTHONY WILLS, FRANK LAWRENCE, JAMES MENDRICK and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
