Cases 61 - 70 of 145
KIRKLAND v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 5:2015cv00340
Plaintiff:
SCOTT KIRKLAND
Defendant:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JACKSON STATE PRISON, RUTLEDGE STATE PRISON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Browner v. Fountain et al
as 6:2015cv00091
Plaintiff:
Antonio Browner
Defendant:
Lisa Fountain, Homes Bryson, Doug Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bagby v. State of Texas, Board of Pardon and Paroles
as 1:2015cv02752
Plaintiff:
Cedric Wayne Bagby
Defendant:
State of Texas, Board of Pardon and Paroles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015cv00291
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
BROWNER v. FOUNTAIN et al
as 5:2015cv00261
Petitioner:
ANTONIO BROWNER
Respondent:
LISA FOUNTAIN, BIBB COUNTY GEORGIA, HOMER BRYSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bearden v. State of Georgia
as 1:2015cv02254
Petitioner:
Rodney Bearden
Respondent:
State of Georgia, Georgia Board of Pardons and Paroles, Albert Murray and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Moore v. Laughlin et al
as 3:2015cv00069
Plaintiff:
David Timothy Moore
Defendant:
Vance Laughlin and Georgia Board of Pardons and Paroles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Moore v. Laughlin et al
as 4:2015cv00175
Plaintiff:
David Timothy Moore
Defendant:
Vance Laughlin and Georgia Board of Pardons and Paroles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Edwards v. Coffee County Facility et al
as 5:2015cv00034
Plaintiff:
Randy Edwards
Defendant:
Coffee County Facility, Corrections Corporation of America, Grady Perry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. Georgia Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2015cv01372
Plaintiff:
Brandon Ray Young
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Corrections, Kevin Davis, Deltonio Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
