Cases 61 - 70 of 70
Drumgo v. Brown et al
as 1:2008cv00592
Plaintiff:
De Shawn Drumgo
Defendant:
Reginald Brown, Thompson, James Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Morgan et al
as 1:2008cv00454
Plaintiff:
Albert James Brown
Defendant:
Phil Morgan, Mark Emig, Carl Danberg and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Watkins v. Danberg et al
as 1:2008cv00248
Plaintiff:
Milek A. Watkins
Defendant:
Carl C. Danberg, Phelps and Andre Brown
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Awala et al v. Wood et al
as 1:2008cv00147
Plaintiff:
Gbeke Awala, Moses H. Awala and Dorcas C. Brown
Defendant:
Kimba M. Wood, Michael B. Mukasey, Rosemary S. Pooler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Biggins v. Minner et al
as 1:2008cv00004
Plaintiff:
James Arthur Biggins
Defendant:
Ruth Ann Minner, Carl C. Danberg, Correctional Medical Services Inc. et al. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Brown v. Biden et al
as 1:2007cv00836
Petitioner:
James E. Brown
Respondent:
Joseph R. Biden and Raphael Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. Williams et al
as 1:2007cv00553
Petitioner:
Michael Brown
Respondent:
Raphael Williams and Attorney General of the State of Delaware
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. Williams, et al
as 1:2003cv00426
Plaintiff:
Albert James Brown
Defendant:
Courtney Porstman, Courtney A., Diana Hernandez and others
Amicu:
First Correctional Medical
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Williams et al
as 1:2007cv00220
Petitioner:
Robert D. Brown
Respondent:
Raphael Williams and Attorney General of State of Delaware
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. Rinehart et al
as 1:2007cv00023
Plaintiff:
Robert D. Brown
Defendant:
Rinehart and Drysdale
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
