Cases 61 - 70 of 121
Ambrose v. Jett et al
as 0:2013cv02343
Petitioner:
Frank Brian Ambrose
Respondent:
B.R. Jett and Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Webber v. Jett et al
as 0:2013cv00654
Petitioner:
Prince S.J. Webber
Respondent:
B.R. Jett and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Spencer v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 0:2013cv00177
Plaintiff:
John Anthony Spencer
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Federal Prison Camp Duluth, MN and Several Un-Named Corrections Officers, Warden, or the Acting Warden therein
Whitbeck v. United States of America, The et al
as 0:2012cv02540
Plaintiff:
Raymond Whitbeck
Defendant:
United States of America, The, Federal Bureau of Prisons, The, John Does I-V and others
Fargas v. United States of America et al
as 0:2012cv02165
Plaintiff:
Luis Fargas
Defendant:
United States of America, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wattleton v. United States Department of Treasury et al
as 0:2012cv00683
Plaintiff:
David Earl Wattleton
Defendant:
United States Department of Treasury, Federal Medical Center Trust Fund Administrator and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Deleston v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 0:2012cv00439
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Deleston
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Gross v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 0:2011cv03415
Plaintiff:
Jamal Gross
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons, NFN Rios and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lucicosky v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 0:2011cv03358
Plaintiff:
Richard Lucicosky
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons , Jets and Does 1 - 50
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Adams v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 0:2011cv02862
Petitioner:
Frankie Edward Adams
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
