Cases 61 - 70 of 113
Regassa v. Brininger et al
as 4:2014cv01122
Plaintiff:
Admassu Regassa
Defendant:
C. Brininger, S Argueta, A. Kranzel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Thompson v. Marr et al
as 1:2014cv00923
Plaintiff:
Roberto Thompson
Defendant:
Robert Marr and Brian Chambers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Schreane v. Chambers
as 3:2014cv00719
Petitioner:
Clarence D Schreane
Respondent:
Brian Chambers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Schreane v. Chambers et al
as 3:2013cv03110
Petitioner:
Clarence D. Schreane
Respondent:
Mr. Chambers and US Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jamison v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2013cv02129
Plaintiff:
Dashawn L. Jamison
Defendant:
John Wetzel, Steven R. Glunt, Jeffrey Ditty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peters v. Langeheine et al
as 3:2013cv01820
Plaintiff:
Brett M. Peters
Defendant:
Langeheine, Hubler, Lan Tiggart and others
Amicu:
K. P. Reisinger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CHAMBERS v. KERESTES et al
as 2:2013cv00850
Petitioner:
BRYAN CHAMBERS
Respondent:
JOHN KERESTES and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chambers v. Wetzell et al
as 1:2013cv01655
Respondent:
John Wetzell, Vincent Mooney, Pennsylvania State Attorney General and others
Petitioner:
Dontae Dion Chambers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robinson v. Southers et al
as 3:2013cv01603
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Robinson
Defendant:
Richard Southers, John Wetzel, Shirley Moore-Smeal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schreane v. Thomas et al
as 3:2013cv01057
Plaintiff:
Clarence D Schreane
Defendant:
Jeff Thomas , Chambers, F. Entzel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
