Cases 61 - 70 of 137
Davis v. Booker et al
as 4:2010cv00012
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Davis
Defendant:
Unknown Booker and Dale Caskey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hicks v. Epps et al
as 4:2010cv00011
Plaintiff:
Aubrey Anthony Hicks
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, Emmitt L. Sparkman, Dale Caskey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hicks v. Caskey et al
as 4:2010cv00006
Plaintiff:
Aubrey Anthony Hicks
Defendant:
Dale Caskey, Bartholomew Grimes, R. Grubb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Ghram et al
as 4:2009cv00179
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Davis
Defendant:
Joyce Ghram and Dale Caskey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Duncan v. Caskey et al
as 4:2009cv00177
Plaintiff:
Wendell Duncan
Defendant:
Dale Caskey, Marion Bart Grimes, Willie Bookert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Caskey
as 5:2009cv00209
Plaintiff:
Kevie Davis
Defendant:
Dale Caskey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rice v. Caskey et al
as 4:2009cv00130
Petitioner:
David Lee Rice
Respondent:
Dale Caskey and Jim Hood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rice v. Caskey et al
as 4:2009cv00172
Plaintiff:
David Lee Rice
Defendant:
Dale Caskey and Jim Hood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moore v. Caskey et al
as 1:2009cv00280
Petitioner:
David Moore
Respondent:
Dale Caskey and Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Winding v. Caskey et al
as 4:2009cv00157
Plaintiff:
James C. Winding
Defendant:
Dale Caskey, Bart Grimes, E. L. Sparkman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
