Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 223
Kostyshyn v. Cauthen et al
as 1:2011cv01141
Plaintiff: Peter Kostyshyn
Defendant: Angelo Cauthen, Rodderick L. Johnson, Jr., P. Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McDougal v. Morgan et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv01079
Petitioner: Andre McDougal
Respondent: Phil Morgan, Carl Danberg and Attorney General of the State of Delaware
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
King et al v. Phelps et al
as 1:2011cv01063
Plaintiff: Lonnie King and Blair Rucker
Defendant: Perry Phelps, Carl Danberg and Michael Costello
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kenneth Abraham v. Carl Danberg, et al
as 11-3864
Plaintiff - Appellant: KENNETH R. ABRAHAM
Defendant - Appellee: CARL C. DANBERG, Commissioner, PHELPS, Warden, DELAWARE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Kostyshyn v. Danberg et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv01002
Petitioner: Peter Kostyshyn
Respondent: Carl Danberg, Jack Markell, P. Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Flonnory v. Danberg et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv00995
Plaintiff: Freddy L. Flonnory
Defendant: Carl Danberg, Perry Phelps, David Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cooke v. Danberg et al
as 1:2011cv00985
Plaintiff: James E. Cooke, Jr.
Defendant: Carl Danberg, Charles H. Toliver, IV, Aaron Goldstein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cooke v. Warrington et al
as 1:2011cv00986
Plaintiff: James E. Cooke, Jr.
Defendant: Warrington, Depp, Perry Phelps and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cooke v. Figliola et al
as 1:2011cv00987
Plaintiff: James E. Cooke, Jr.
Defendant: Anthony A. Figliola, Jr., Carl Danberg and Peter W. Veith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cooke v. Wood et al
as 1:2011cv00984
Plaintiff: James E. Cooke, Jr.
Defendant: Steven P. Wood, Diane C. Walsh, Paul R. Wallace and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?