Cases 61 - 70 of 434
Dobbs et al v. Ascension Parish Jail et al
as 3:2022cv00177
Plaintiff:
Daniel L. Dobbs, Jeremy Blackman and Haluk Ares
Defendant:
Ascension Parish Jail, S Winchester, Unkown Moses and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kight v. Vannoy
as 2:2022cv00584
Plaintiff:
Daniel Heath Kight
Defendant:
Darryl Vannoy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Akins v. Morehouse Parish et al
as 3:2022cv00468
Plaintiff:
Glen Akins
Defendant:
4th District Law Enforcement Morehouse Parish, Police Dept City of Bastrop, Louisiana State Police and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Martin et al
as 3:2022cv00113
Plaintiff:
Bryant K. Jones
Defendant:
Heath Martin and Daniel Edward
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Darville v. Ascension Parish Jail et al
as 3:2022cv00053
Plaintiff:
Donovan Darville
Defendant:
Ascension Parish Jail, Ascension Parish Sheriff Office, Jeff Wiley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hutchinson v. Smith et al
as 2:2022cv00078
Plaintiff:
Justin Antonio Hutchinson
Defendant:
Randy Smith, Warren Montgomery, Jose Ham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Griffin v. Fleischman
as 2:2021cv02259
Plaintiff:
Jason Leon Griffin
Defendant:
Daniel Fleischman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Gordon v. Vannoy et al
as 2:2021cv02234
Plaintiff:
Daniel Gordan and Daniel Gordon
Defendant:
Darryl Vannoy
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
De La Cruz Jimenez v. USA
as 2:2021cv04053
Plaintiff:
Rafael Daniel De La Cruz Jimenez
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Matthews et al v. Lo et al
as 2:2021cv01862
Plaintiff:
Cody M. Matthews, Frank William Beckendorf, III and Frank W. Beckendorf, III
Defendant:
William Lo, J. Ham, Aaron Mendow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
